Showing articles tagged with 'Fair trading'
-
Consumer Affairs ÌÒÉ«ÊÓÆµ is taking Andreas Triantafyllos, 44, to court for failing to attend and give evidence in accordance with statutory notices. We issued those notices under the Australian Consumer Law and Fair Trading Act 2012 as part of an investigation into luxury car hire services.
-
A solar panel retailer which made misleading representations to consumers and engaged in unconscionable conduct, among other breaches of the Australian Consumer Law, has been fined $3 million in the Federal Court, and its Director ordered to pay $450,000.
-
The Director of Consumer Affairs ÌÒÉ«ÊÓÆµ, Nicole Rich, has issued a public warning to consumers about furniture removalist company Ajanvi Pty Ltd, trading as My Moovers.
-
The Director of Consumer Affairs ÌÒÉ«ÊÓÆµ has started legal action against estate agency Colliers International (ÌÒÉ«ÊÓÆµ) Pty Ltd for alleged underquoting and making misleading representations about property sale prices.
-
In Touch Fashions & Gifts Pty Ltd and its director have agreed to pay $1,000 to the ÌÒÉ«ÊÓÆµn Consumer Law Fund. They acknowledged offering items for sale that did not meet mandatory information standards.
-
An unregistered builder who contravened ÌÒÉ«ÊÓÆµn consumer and domestic building contract laws has been ordered to pay penalties totalling $46,200, plus costs of $5,000.
-
Consumer Affairs ÌÒÉ«ÊÓÆµ has started legal action against a solar company that we allege did not comply with the unsolicited consumer agreement provisions of the Australian Consumer Law (ÌÒÉ«ÊÓÆµ), plus other breaches of consumer law.
-
A company and its director who breached the Australian Consumer Law’s product safety provisions have been ordered to pay a total of $415,000 in penalties, plus $15,000 in costs.
-
A company that engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct by sending out certain types of unsolicited notices for domain name registrations has been ordered to offer a $249 refund each to more than 9,800 customers.
-
Cain Robert Padman, 35, (trading as Priority Fencing Projects and Constructions), has been convicted, fined $3,000 and ordered to refund two customers $1,674 in total; Mr Padman pleaded guilty at Frankston Magistrates’ Court to breaching ÌÒÉ«ÊÓÆµn domestic building contract and consumer laws
Previous
Go to:
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Page 4 of 13
Next