ࡱ> )` bjbj 7;D|F|F|F8F|0G߈G J"JJJ0LjOP^``````$h/T0L0L/T/TJJ45[5[5[/TJJ^5[/T^5[5[|JG IB|FV.$J0߈RX,HQQ|5[@RdRQQQZ^QQQ߈/T/T/T/Td4|F|F"6D Preventing unfair terms in window and floor covering agreements A guide for legal practitioners and consumer advocates This guide was developed by: Australian Capital Territory Office of Regulatory Services Australian Competition and Consumer Commission Australian Securities and Investments Commission Consumer Affairs and Fair Trading Tasmania Consumer Affairs ɫƵ Consumer and Business Services South Australia New South Wales Fair Trading Northern Territory Consumer Affairs Queensland Office of Fair Trading Western Australia Department of Commerce, Consumer Protection Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 2014 ISBN 1 921079 43 6 This publication is available for your use under a Creative Commons By Attribution 3.0 Australia licence, with the exception of the Australian Consumer Law logo, photographs, images, signatures and where otherwise stated. The full licence terms are available from  HYPERLINK "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcode" http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcode. Use of Commonwealth material under a Creative Commons By Attribution 3.0 Australia licence requires you to attribute the work (but not in any way that suggests that the Commonwealth endorses you or your use of the work). Material used as supplied Provided you have not modified or transformed the material in any way, then the Commonwealth prefers the following attribution: Source: Commonwealth of Australia Derivative material If you have modified or transformed the material, or derived new material in any way, then the Commonwealth prefers the following attribution: Based on the Commonwealth of Australia material Inquiries regarding this licence and any other use of this document are welcome at: Manager Communications The Treasury Langton Crescent Parkes ACT 2600 Email: HYPERLINK "mailto:medialiaison@treasury.gov.au"medialiaison@treasury.gov.au Contents  TOC \o "1-2" Introduction  PAGEREF _Toc267747835 \h 3 1. Understanding Australias unfair contract term legislation  PAGEREF _Toc267747836 \h 3 How does unfair contract term legislation work?  PAGEREF _Toc267747837 \h 3 What is an unfair term?  PAGEREF _Toc267747838 \h 3 What is a standard form consumer contract?  PAGEREF _Toc267747839 \h 3 What is the effect of an unfair term?  PAGEREF _Toc267747840 \h 3 What is the aim of enforcement action?  PAGEREF _Toc267747841 \h 3 Will using this guide protect a business from having a term made void?  PAGEREF _Toc267747842 \h 3 2. Common unfair terms in window and floor covering agreements  PAGEREF _Toc267747843 \h 3 Deposits and part payments  PAGEREF _Toc267747844 \h 3 Payment before completion of work  PAGEREF _Toc267747845 \h 3 Payment default  PAGEREF _Toc267747846 \h 3 Reservation of ownership of goods  PAGEREF _Toc267747847 \h 3 Cancellation  PAGEREF _Toc267747848 \h 3 Offences under the ACL  PAGEREF _Toc267747849 \h 3 Liability exclusions  PAGEREF _Toc267747850 \h 3 Variations from samples  PAGEREF _Toc267747851 \h 3 Contract variations  PAGEREF _Toc267747852 \h 3 Pre-installation work  PAGEREF _Toc267747853 \h 3 Reliance on consumers expertise  PAGEREF _Toc267747854 \h 3 Entire agreement terms  PAGEREF _Toc267747855 \h 3 3. Australian Consumer Law unfair contract term legislation  PAGEREF _Toc267747856 \h 3 Section 23 Unfair terms of consumer contracts  PAGEREF _Toc267747857 \h 3 Section 24 Meaning of unfair  PAGEREF _Toc267747858 \h 3 Section 25 Examples of unfair terms  PAGEREF _Toc267747859 \h 3 Section 26 Terms that define main subject matter of consumer contracts etc. are unaffected  PAGEREF _Toc267747860 \h 3 Section 27 Standard form contracts  PAGEREF _Toc267747861 \h 3 Section 28 Contracts to which this Part does not apply  PAGEREF _Toc267747862 \h 3 Contacts  PAGEREF _Toc267747863 \h 3  Introduction This guide will help legal practitioners and consumer advocates recognise unfair terms in contracts for window and floor coverings (curtains, blinds, carpets and hard floor coverings). It will also help them understand how Australian consumer protection agencies apply unfair contract term legislation to such contracts. This legislation is part of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) and reproduced in Chapter 3 of this guide. It gives consumers, and the agencies that protect their interests, a new avenue to address the content of consumer contracts. This guide is based on a Consumer Affairs ɫƵ review of window and floor covering agreements. The review was prompted by complaints about retailers in this industry. A large number of these complaints were about the fairness of terms in consumer contracts. The guide explains why consumer protection agencies consider some common terms unfair, outlines the basis on which they are likely to take enforcement action, and includes examples of types of terms that may be considered unfair. These examples are not a definitive list of what is unfair under the legislation. Ultimately, courts and tribunals decide if a term is unfair. Consumer protection agencies believe that fair contracts benefit consumers and businesses, by helping to create a fair and open marketplace. Legal practitioners should use this guide to review terms, and change or remove any unfair terms, in agreements they prepare for this industry. We will monitor industry compliance with the unfair contract term legislation. In this guide: unfair contract term legislation means the legislation in Part 2-3 of Schedule 2 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 consumer guarantees in relation to defective goods or services mean the consumer guarantees set out in Division 1 of Part 3-2 of Schedule 2 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010. This guide and other publications about unfair consumer contract terms are available at HYPERLINK "http://www.consumerlaw.gov.au/"  www.consumerlaw.gov.au. Understanding Australias unfair contract term legislation How does unfair contract term legislation work? The legislation empowers consumers and consumer protection agencies to seek a court or tribunal: declaration that a term in a consumer contract is unfair injunction against the business using the term in its consumer contracts remedial order for any losses suffered. Enforcement of unfair contract term legislation is shared by the: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) state and territory consumer protection agencies. These agencies work together to ensure a consistent approach to compliance and enforcement. What is an unfair term? A term in a standard form consumer contract is unfair if it: causes a significant imbalance in the parties rights and obligations under the contract is not reasonably necessary to protect a legitimate interest of the business, and would cause detriment (financial or otherwise) if it were to be applied or relied upon. In assessing whether a term is unfair, the legislation requires that: the contract as a whole be taken into account, including any countervailing favourable terms the transparency of the term be taken into account; that is, whether the term is: expressed in reasonably plain language legible presented clearly readily available to the consumer or any party affected by the term. A term does not come under the unfair contract terms legislation if it: defines the main subject matter of the contract sets the up-front price, or is permitted by another law. A term can be unfair regardless of the businesss intention or whether the term has been relied upon. A significant imbalance in the parties rights and obligations under the contract is created when a term: gives powers to the business that it would not otherwise or usually have protects the business in a way that puts the consumer at a disadvantage alters their position under the ordinary rules of contract or the general law shifts risks to the consumer that the business is better placed to manage. The legislation sets out some examples of possible unfair terms. This includes terms that permit the supplier but not the consumer to: avoid or limit performance of the contract terminate the contract change the terms of the contract renew or not renew the contract. It also includes terms that permit the supplier to: vary the price without the consumer having the right to terminate the contract unilaterally vary the characteristics of the goods or services to be supplied under the contract unilaterally determine whether the contract has been breached or to interpret its meaning assign the contract to the consumers detriment, without the consumers consent. Other examples of possible unfair terms given in the legislation include those that: penalise the consumer but not the supplier for a breach or termination of the contract limit the suppliers vicarious liability for its agents limit the consumers right to sue the supplier limit the evidence the consumer can produce in legal proceedings relating to the contract impose the evidential burden on the consumer in such legal proceedings. What is a standard form consumer contract? A consumer contract is a contract for the supply of goods or services to an individual consumer (that is, not to a company) who buys them wholly or predominantly for personal, domestic or household use or consumption. The legislation does not explain what constitutes a standard form consumer contract. However, it is essentially a pre-prepared contract that a business uses for its customers that is not open to negotiation by the consumer. Assessing whether a contract is a standard form contract takes into account whether the: supplier has all or most of the bargaining power contract was prepared by the supplier before any discussion relating to the transaction occurred with the consumer consumer was, in effect, required either to accept or reject the contract terms in the form in which they were presented consumer was given an effective opportunity to negotiate the contract terms contract terms take into account the specific characteristics of the consumer or the particular transaction. What is the effect of an unfair term? If a term in a standard form contract is declared unfair, it is void. However, the contract continues to bind the parties unless it cannot operate without the unfair term. What is the aim of enforcement action? By taking enforcement action, consumer protection agencies aim to change behaviour to promote compliance and stop offending behaviour. Will using this guide protect a business from having a term made void? Using this guide cannot protect a business from having a term in its agreement declared unfair by a court or tribunal; it is not to be relied upon as legal advice. If you are unsure whether a term is unfair, obtain independent legal advice. Common unfair terms in window and floor covering agreements This section discusses unfair terms that Consumer Affairs ɫƵ identified in its analysis of window and floor covering contracts. The contracts covered similar content, including: deposits and part payments payment before completion of work payment default reservation of ownership of goods cancellation liability exclusions contract variations pre-installation work reliance on consumer expertise. Deposits and part payments A number of contracts required consumers to lodge large deposits. For example: A deposit of one-third upon order is required, the balance to be paid when collecting goods from the store or before installation or otherwise agreed to by [supplier]. 50 per cent deposit to be paid before work can commence. Payment of the balance is due and payable upon notification by [supplier] that the window coverings are available for installation. Consumer protection agencies consider a genuine deposit to be an amount that ensures that the consumer is serious about going ahead with the contract. It is also an amount that ensures the supplier will: limit dealings with other potential buyers start allocating resources to the contract spend time and effort preparing for the contract. The deposit should be no more than the minimum needed to achieve these goals normally, not more than 10 per cent of the price. This is because a genuine deposit can be forfeited if the consumer does not go ahead with the contract regardless of the suppliers actual losses, and not affecting the suppliers right to recover losses greater than the deposit. When an upfront payment exceeds 10 per cent of the price, the excess should be treated as part payment of the price. Part payments are different to deposits. Unlike deposits, part payments are refundable if the consumer opts out of the contract less any actual (and reasonable) losses suffered by the supplier, if the deposit does not cover these. Requiring part payment is not unfair if limited to the amount necessary to start work on the contract. In some cases, it will be fair even if the part payment also covers the cost of materials necessary for the job, particularly if the materials are specialised, as is often the case with window and floor coverings. A term that entitles the supplier to keep all of a part payment if the consumer cancels the contract would be considered unfair. It may also be a common law penalty (and unenforceable) because it would be difficult to claim it was a genuine pre-estimate of the suppliers loss from the cancellation. Excessive deposits or part payments leave the consumer vulnerable to being out-of-pocket if the business goes bankrupt before the job is finished. Payment before completion of work A number of contracts required the consumer to pay the price or the balance of the account prior to installation. The normal right of consumers is to pay the full price only on installation, and if the product and workmanship are satisfactory. Consumers should have an opportunity to inspect the work before payment. The following terms would normally be considered as unfair: Please note you are hereby accepting the C.O.D. payment to the layer as detailed above, and all the conditions on the face hereof. You will be required to pay the balance of the price on collection of the goods or prior to installation of the goods. Payment default When a consumer defaults on payment, the supplier is entitled to charge reasonable costs for collecting the debt. Consumer Affairs ɫƵ found examples of terms that sought to charge defaulting consumers for a number of costs considered unfair. These included solicitor-to-client costs in legal proceedings or commissions paid to debt collectors. The fair interest rate on overdue amounts is considered to be the rate prescribed by penalty interest rate legislation in each state and territory as applying to judgement debts. The contract rate should not exceed it, unless a supplier can show that a higher rate is not unfair for instance, because the higher rate represents the suppliers actual cost-of-funds. The following terms would normally be considered unfair: Any collection charges, legal expenses and commissions incurred in attempting to recover payment shall be payable by the customer. If the customer defaults in payment by the due date then all money becomes immediately due and payable and the company may, without prejudice to any other remedy available to it: charge the customer interest at the rate of 1.5 per cent per month [i.e. 18 per cent per annum at a time when the rate under the penalty interest rate legislation was 10.5 per cent per annum] until the date of payment in full charge the customer for all costs and expenses resulting from the default. Reservation of ownership of goods To secure payment, many suppliers insert a term in their contracts stating that ownership in the goods they sell does not pass to the consumer until the total price is paid. If the consumer defaults in payment, the term will enable the business to recover the goods on the basis that it still owns them including recovering the goods by entering the consumers premises. This is not unfair, although the business should not include or exercise any right to enter the consumers premises forcefully or without consent. It should seek a court order to enforce its right to enter. But it is unfair when the term enables the supplier to damage the consumers premises, or its value. This will most likely be the case when the goods have already been affixed to the consumers land or house: for example, a hardwood-floor supplier exercising a right to enter the consumers house to remove flooring that was installed but not paid for. In these cases, the business should pursue the consumer for the debt in the courts. The following term would normally be considered unfair: Ownership of goods on this order will not pass to the customer until the invoice is paid in full and until paid the customer will allow the retailer access to the job address to retrieve the goods if requested to do so. Cancellation A number of terms restricted a consumers right to cancel their contract, without penalty, if the supplier was unable to fulfil the entire order or if there was a delay in supplying the goods as agreed. A failure or inability of the business to supply a substantial or significant part of the order is a fundamental breach of the contract. It entitles the consumer to cancel the whole contract without penalty, even if the failure or inability is beyond the suppliers control. A term that only allows the consumer to cancel the affected part of a contract is considered unfair. Examples of such terms are: In the event of the company being unable to supply part of this order and the company accepts cancellation of that part, cancellation applies to such part only. Where multiple goods have been ordered by you under this contract, you will not be entitled to terminate this contract in its entirety if any of those goods has been delayed for any of the reasons specified in clause 4. In such case, you may terminate only that part of the contract which has been affected by such delay and we will refund any monies you have paid to us relating to the affected goods less any reasonable costs incurred by us. Terms that prevent the consumer from cancelling a contract, without penalty, if the supplier is unable to supply on time are considered unfair even if the delay is beyond the suppliers control. While it is not unfair for a supplier to deny liability for loss or damage caused to a consumer from causes outside the suppliers control, it is unfair if this extends to disallowing the consumer from cancelling the contract, without penalty. Inability to supply on time means supply: beyond any exact date contracted for beyond a reasonably short time after an approximate date given, or if no date (exact or approximate) was specified, beyond a reasonable time after entering the contract. The following terms would normally be considered unfair to the extent that they relate to the consumers inability to cancel, without penalty: The delivery time quoted by [supplier] is an estimate only and we cannot be held responsible for fabric or material delays, industrial action, strikes or manufacturing delays. [Supplier] will not be responsible for delay in completing or failure to complete such work caused by circumstances for which [supplier] is not responsible or has no control over, for example transport strikes, industrial disputation or manufacturing delays. When consumers simply change their mind and cancel the contract, it is considered unfair to require them to pay a cancellation fee unrelated to the suppliers reasonable costs caused by the early termination for example, a requirement to pay all of the suppliers costs and expenses or an arbitrary fee. The following term would normally be considered unfair: In the event of a cancellation by the customer after the material has been cut or specially ordered for you from any supplier, the customer agrees to pay, as liquidated damages a sum equal to 40 per cent of the total purchase price. Offences under the ACL The supplier commits an offence under the ACL if it fails to supply all the agreed goods or services by the agreed time unless: the failure was due to something beyond its control; or it took reasonable precautions and exercised due diligence to avoid the failure; or the consumer agrees to accept replacement goods or services. The supplier also commits an offence under the ACL if, when it accepts payment: it intends not to supply the goods or services; or it intends to supply something different from that agreed; or it is reckless about whether it will be able to supply the goods or services by the agreed time. Liability exclusions The statutory consumer guarantees under the ACL require that goods match any description or sample (see further below) and be reasonably: fit for their common or any specified purposes acceptable in appearance or finish free from defects safe durable. They also require that services, such as window and floor covering installation services, be rendered with due care and skill and be completed by a reasonable time (if no time is specified in the contract). If the consumer specifies a particular purpose for the services when the contract is made, the services must be reasonably fit for that purpose. If the consumer specifies any result that the services should achieve when the contract is made, the services must be of a nature, quality, state or condition that would reasonably be expected to achieve that result. In the case of Cavalier Marketing (Australia) Pty Ltd v Rasell, the Queensland Court of Appeal held that a carpet with pile reversal or watermarking substantial enough to affect its decorative use, or the purchasers aesthetic appreciation of it, breached the consumer guarantees. The consumer guarantees for goods apply not just to new or off-the-shelf goods but also to seconds, sale items, bespoke items, and goods taken on approval and then purchased. It is an offence for a supplier to attempt to exclude, restrict or modify these rights or its liability for a breach including placing time limits on claims shorter than those allowed under the legislation. Such terms are void. Broad exclusions or limitations of liability are also void because, whether intentional or not, they claim to apply to the consumer guarantees. For example: In the event that installers assist with removal of furniture and effects then neither they nor the company will be responsible for any loss or damage thereto. No exchange, credit or refund on goods taken on Home Approval and then subsequently purchased. No exchange, credit or refund on cut length goods or *special buy-ins (*rugs ordered to a specific size or make up, i.e. not normally available from our standard range). [Supplier] will not be liable for any loss or damage suffered by the Customer as a result of any act, omission or statement made by [supplier], its employees, contractors or agents whether in contract, negligence or howsoever otherwise, except that nothing in these conditions limits any liability imposed by any statute unless or to the extent that it is lawful to do so. One of the problems with the last term is that, legally, suppliers are liable for their own and their employees and agents negligence or lack of due care and skill. Consumer protection agencies also consider such terms unfair as they: permit or have the effect of permitting the supplier to avoid or limit performance of the contract limit or have the effect of limiting the consumers right to sue the supplier limit or have the effect of limiting the suppliers vicarious liability for its employees or agents alter the legal position that would otherwise have applied. Examples of limitations or modifications of the statutory rights that are not allowed are terms that: put a monetary limit on compensation place a time limit on claims shorter than provided for under the legislation exclude pure economic loss. For example: Exchange, credit or refund only on goods returned within 48 hours of date of purchase and in original condition. Goods subject to manufacturer fault must be returned within seven days of date of purchase and can only be exchanged for goods of equal or greater value. Many terms that exclude or limit a suppliers liability for loss or damage indirectly attempt to cater for the statutory rights. For example: ...except that nothing in these conditions limits any liability imposed by any statute unless or to the extent that it is lawful to do so (see above). Such terms are likely to be considered unfair terms that limit or have the effect of limiting the consumers right to sue the supplier for a breach of a statutory right, because most consumers will not know what that law is. These terms also tend to mislead consumers about their rights. While giving the appearance of complying with the law, they do not help consumers who are ignorant of their rights and who will think the term prevents them making a claim. It is the lack of transparency that makes such terms unfair they are not presented clearly and are misleading. Liability exclusions must clearly direct consumers to their statutory rights, or consumer protection agencies will consider such terms unfair. For example: For consumers, our goods come with non- excludable guarantees under the ACL, such as that we are the rightful owner, the goods are reasonably fit for their purpose, are not damaged and match any description or sample. You are entitled, at your option, to a refund, repair or replacement for a major failure, and to compensation for any other loss. These rights are separate from any manufacturers warranty. In addition, the ACL requires the manufacturer or importer to compensate you for any loss if the goods are, for example, not reasonably fit for their purpose. You have the option of seeking compensation from the manufacturer/importer or from us. For consumers, our services come with non- excludable guarantees under the ACL that they will be provided with due care and skill and be reasonably fit for their purpose. You are entitled, at your option, to a refund or the re-supply of the services for a major failure, and to compensation for any other loss. Variations from samples Most contracts reviewed by Consumer Affairs ɫƵ warned consumers that the installed product might differ from the sample shown before they entered into the contract. Some also sought to exclude liability for such variations, for example: Variations of shade can occur in the manufacturing of different materials. [Supplier] will take every care to obtain the best effect but cannot assume responsibility for variations in colour or grain structure. Some cut-pile carpets may exhibit an appearance change of random light and dark areas after installation. This is known as shading, tracking, pile reversal or watermarking and is caused by movement of the carpet fibres in different directions as the result of normal use. The customer acknowledges that this does not indicate the floor coverings are defective. Whilst manufacturers make every effort to match dye lots, the customer acknowledges that colour shades may vary from the samples shown. [Supplier] accepts no responsibility for changes in length shrinkage or dropping of material, and [supplier] shall not be liable in any way for loss or damage as a consequence therefore. Any alterations due to this will be charged. When a sample is used in the supply of goods, the ACLs statutory consumer guarantees require that the: goods match the sample in quality consumer will have a reasonable opportunity to compare the goods with the sample goods will be free from hidden defects that the consumer was not aware of at the time of sale. Consumer protection agencies recognise that using natural materials can lead to differences between samples and the goods supplied. For example, differences in the: shading or piling of carpet caused by unavoidable differences in the wool colouring of wood flooring caused by different levels of sunlight exposure. If businesses use contract terms to disclaim or exclude liability for particular aspects of the product from a sample, they must ensure consumers rights in relation to guarantees are clear and transparent. General or vague warnings also do not overcome the problems. For example: The sample that you have been shown represents a species not a colour. Colour variations within the panel, and from panel to panel can be extreme. Timber is likely to change colour quite dramatically when exposed to UV light. The panel you have viewed may appear different from the timber in the pack. The colour and texture of timber blinds may vary by 15 per cent to the sample. It is not enough simply to inform the consumer that the installed product may differ from the sample. A supplier must tell the consumer exactly how the installed product might differ from the sample (specifying a percentage is insufficient), or provide a sample that shows the actual differences. Contract variations Some contracts attempt to provide for problems due to errors or misunderstandings in the quoting process. They do this by inserting a unilateral variation power, which gives them the power to change the contract details for example: Any errors or omissions in quantities and/or measurements made by [supplier] are excepted, and [supplier] reserves the right to make any variations to the quotation, the order and the price arising out of any such errors or omissions. Consumer protection agencies have serious concerns about unilateral variation powers in short-term, one-off contracts such as those it reviewed. They can be used to defeat the legitimate expectations of the consumer, based on a signed contract. Best practice is to discuss the error or misunderstanding with the consumer and together agree to contract changes and put them in writing or, if that proves impossible, to allow the consumer to cancel the contract, without penalty. Pre-installation work Some suppliers quoted prices on the assumption that consumers would provide them with clear access to windows, remove existing floor coverings or otherwise prepare the workplace. A supplier should make it clear to the consumer, before work starts, what they will charge for pre- installation work. General statements that consumers will have to carry the cost are insufficient. This should be part of the quotation, so the consumer can choose not to proceed if the cost is unacceptable. The following terms show the need for transparency: The price for installation of the goods specified in the quotation is subject to the windows being clear of existing coverings and the provision of reasonable access to the windows at the time of installation. If at the time of installation, the windows are not clear of existing coverings and reasonable access is not provided to us to effectively and efficiently install the goods then we reserve the right to adjust the installation price specified in the quotation to cover our reasonable costs of removing the existing coverings and to obtain reasonable access to the windows. It is the customers responsibility to ensure there is a suitable fixing point prior to installation. Items to be cleared from in front of the window to allow a one metre access to the window at the time of installation. Where customers are responsible for the removal of any existing window coverings, a charge will apply if a contract fitter is required to remove any existing window coverings on the actual date of installation. This also applies to terms that allow for contingencies, such as: installation of window coverings at a height over three metres may be subjected to additional charges for scaffolding, high ladders and safety equipment. Reliance on consumers expertise Several contracts contained terms that claimed to deny all liability for damage arising from the consumers failure to identify problems with the work site for example: it is the customers responsibility to advise the retailer of any defects or irregularities in the subfloor prior to installation of the floor coverings. No loss or damage will be accepted by the retailer for any reason whatsoever as a result of defects in the subfloor. It is not unfair to require consumers to advise the supplier of matters within their knowledge. However, these terms are considered unfair to the extent that they absolve the supplier from responsibility to ask the consumer relevant questions before starting work and to apply expertise in assessing the site. These terms claim to absolve the suppliers liability for any damage that its installers cause. This conflicts with the consumers statutory right to have services provided with due care and skill, and which are reasonably fit for their purpose. Entire agreement terms Entire agreement terms state that the entire agreement between the parties is contained in the written contract. They deny the power of any associated oral agreement or any oral representations made to the consumer, by the supplier or its employees and agents. These terms are normally ineffective in legal cases. But they can mislead or deter consumers from exercising their rights. They are considered an unfair limitation on: a consumers right to sue the supplier the evidence a consumer can lead in proceedings on the contract. Consumer protection agencies have similar concerns about terms that: require the consumer to acknowledge that no representations have been made that are not in the written contract; or specify that the only valid representations, amendments or waivers are those in writing signed by a senior officer of the supplier. It is acceptable for a contract to specify that such things must be in writing and signed by a senior officer of the supplier. It is not acceptable that these are the only valid representations, amendments or waivers. For example: it is agreed between the parties that the terms and conditions constitute the entire agreement between the parties and that oral statements made prior to this agreement neither induced its execution nor form part of it. Australian Consumer Law unfair contract term legislation Section 23 Unfair terms of consumer contracts A term of a consumer contract is void if: the term is unfair; and the contract is a standard form contract. The contract continues to bind the parties if it is capable of operating without the unfair term. A consumer contract is a contract for: a supply of goods or services; or a sale or grant of an interest in land; to an individual whose acquisition of the goods, services or interest is wholly or predominantly for personal, domestic or household use or consumption. Section 24 Meaning of unfair A term of a consumer contract is unfair if: it would cause a significant imbalance in the parties rights and obligations arising under the contract; and it is not reasonably necessary in order to protect the legitimate interests of the party who would be advantaged by the term; and it would cause detriment (whether financial or otherwise) to a party if it were to be applied or relied on. In determining whether a term of a consumer contract is unfair under subsection (1), a court may take into account such matters as it thinks relevant, but must take into account the following: the extent to which the term is transparent; the contract as a whole. A term is transparent if the term is: expressed in reasonably plain language; and legible; and presented clearly; and readily available to any party affected by the term. For the purposes of subsection (1)(b), a term of a consumer contract is presumed not to be reasonably necessary in order to protect the legitimate interests of the party who would be advantaged by the term, unless that party proves otherwise. Section 25 Examples of unfair terms Without limiting section 24, the following are examples of the kinds of terms of a consumer contract that may be unfair: a term that permits, or has the effect of permitting, one party (but not another party) to avoid or limit performance of the contract; a term that permits, or has the effect of permitting, one party (but not another party) to terminate the contract; a term that penalises, or has the effect of penalising, one party (but not another party) for a breach or termination of the contract; a term that permits, or has the effect of permitting, one party (but not another party) to vary the terms of the contract; a term that permits, or has the effect of permitting, one party (but not another party) to renew or not renew the contract; a term that permits, or has the effect of permitting, one party to vary the upfront price payable under the contract without the right of another party to terminate the contract; a term that permits, or has the effect of permitting, one party unilaterally to vary the characteristics of the goods or services to be supplied, or the interest in land to be sold or granted, under the contract; a term that permits, or has the effect of permitting, one party unilaterally to determine whether the contract has been breached or to interpret its meaning; a term that limits, or has the effect of limiting, one partys vicarious liability for its agents; a term that permits, or has the effect of permitting, one party to assign the contract to the detriment of another party without that other partys consent; a term that limits, or has the effect of limiting, one partys right to sue another party; a term that limits, or has the effect of limiting, the evidence one party can adduce in proceedings relating to the contract; a term that imposes, or has the effect of imposing, the evidential burden on one party in proceedings relating to the contract; a term of a kind, or a term that has an effect of a kind, prescribed by the regulations. Before the Governor-General makes a regulation for the purposes of subsection (1)(n) prescribing a kind of term, or a kind of effect that a term has, the minister must take into consideration: the detriment that a term of that kind would cause to consumers; and the impact on business generally of prescribing that kind of term or effect; and the public interest. Section 26 Terms that define main subject matter of consumer contracts etc. are unaffected Section 23 does not apply to a term of a consumer contract to the extent, but only to the extent, that the term: defines the main subject matter of the contract; or sets the upfront price payable under the contract; or is a term required, or expressly permitted, by a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory. The upfront price payable under a consumer contract is the consideration that: is provided, or is to be provided, for the supply, sale or grant under the contract; and is disclosed at or before the time the contract is entered into; but does not include any other consideration that is contingent on the occurrence or non- occurrence of a particular event. Section 27 Standard form contracts If a party to a proceeding alleges that a contract is a standard form contract, it is presumed to be a standard form contract unless another party to the proceeding proves otherwise. In determining whether a contract is a standard form contract, a court may take into account such matters as it thinks relevant, but must take into account the following: whether one of the parties has all or most of the bargaining power relating to the transaction; whether the contract was prepared by one party before any discussion relating to the transaction occurred between the parties; whether another party was, in effect, required either to accept or reject the terms of the contract (other than the terms referred to in section 26(1)) in the form in which they were presented; whether another party was given an effective opportunity to negotiate the terms of the contract that were not the terms referred to in section 26(1); whether the terms of the contract (other than the terms referred to in section 26(1)) take into account the specific characteristics of another party or the particular transaction; any other matter prescribed by the regulations. Section 28 Contracts to which this Part does not apply This Part does not apply to: a contract of marine salvage or towage; or a charter party of a ship; or a contract for the carriage of goods by ship. Without limiting subsection (1)(c), the reference in that subsection to a contract for the carriage of goods by ship includes a reference to any contract covered by a sea carriage document within the meaning of the amended Hague Rules referred to in section 7(1) of the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1991. This Part does not apply to a contract that is the constitution (within the meaning of section 9 of the Corporations Act 2001) of a company, managed investment scheme or other kind of body. Contacts Australian Capital Territory Office of Regulatory Services GPO Box 158 Canberra ACT 2601 T. (02) 6207 3000  HYPERLINK "http://ors.act.gov.au" ors.act.gov.au Commonwealth Australian Competition and Consumer Commission GPO Box 3131 Canberra ACT 2601 T. 1300 302 502  HYPERLINK "http://accc.gov.au" accc.gov.au Australian Securities and Investments Commission PO Box 9827 (in your capital city) T. 1300 300 630  HYPERLINK "http://asic.gov.au" asic.gov.au New South Wales NSW Fair Trading PO Box 972 Parramatta NSW 2124 T. 13 32 20  HYPERLINK "http://fairtrading.nsw.gov.au" fairtrading.nsw.gov.au Northern Territory Northern Territory Consumer Affairs PO Box 40946 Casuarina NT 0811 T. 1800 019 319  HYPERLINK "http://www.consumeraffairs.nt.gov.au/Pages/default.aspx" consumeraffairs.nt.gov.au Queensland Office of Fair Trading GPO Box 3111 Brisbane QLD 4001 T. 13 QGOV (13 74 68)  HYPERLINK "http://fairtrading.qld.gov.au" fairtrading.qld.gov.au South Australia Consumer and Business Services GPO Box 1719 Adelaide SA 5001 T. 13 18 82  HYPERLINK "http://www.cbs.sa.gov.au/wcm/" cbs.sa.gov.au Tasmania Consumer Affairs and Fair Trading GPO Box 1244 Hobart TAS 7001 T. 1300 654 499  HYPERLINK "http://www.consumer.tas.gov.au/" www.consumer.tas.gov.au ɫƵ Consumer Affairs ɫƵ GPO Box 123 Melbourne VIC 3001 T. 1300 55 81 81  HYPERLINK "http://www.consumer.vic.gov.au" consumer.vic.gov.au Western Australia Department of Commerce Consumer Protection Locked Bag 14 Cloisters Square WA 6850 T. 1300 30 40 54  HYPERLINK "http://www.commerce.wa.gov.au" commerce.wa.gov.au  The words contract and agreement have the same meaning, and both are used in this document.  The duty to render services with due care and skill is analogous to the common law duty not to render services negligently.  (1990) 96 ALR 375  In longer-term contracts, unilateral variation powers can often be justified because of the likelihood of a change of circumstances during the term of the contract. In these cases, any unfairness to the consumer can usually be ameliorated by allowing the consumer to cancel, without penalty, if they do not accept a change.     PAGE  PAGE 1 Australia Consumer Law Preventing unfair terms in window and floor covering agreements DTPLI8402_07/14 &,wxyu v F I t u f g   !"QRSopqr|}͹ͨjhg!UmHnHuhg!mHnHujhKUhK hN0JjhNUhhN0JjhNUjhNU hN5\hhN5\ hhNhNh"h hh1@wx 1 \ v  F G H I u  Q & FgdNgdNgdgdqr|g4{B}1^6lB%$ ( $ ( gd gdNGHbcdefgĻĻỪĦzozdzjhg!Ujhg!U(h/hg!CJOJQJaJmHnHtHh30jhg!Ujhg!Uhg! jhg!UmHnHuhg!mHnHu&h/hg!5OJQJmHnHtHuh30mHnHujhg!UmHnHu jhg!UmHnHu'/01234[\vwxyz{"#=>?@AB]^xyz{|б~ujjhg!Uh30mHnHu jhg!UmHnHujhg!UmHnHu&h/hg!5OJQJmHnHtHuhg!mHnHujhg!Ujhg!U(h/hg!CJOJQJaJmHnHtHh30j hg!Ujhg!Uhg!)|},-./01>?YZ[\]^uvjj hg!Ujhg!Ujphg!Ujhg!Ujvhg!Ujhg!Uh30j|hg!Ujhg!Uhg!(h/hg!CJOJQJaJmHnHtH8123456LMghijkl"#=>?@릒sjh30mHnHu j hg!UmHnHujhg!UmHnHu&h/hg!5OJQJmHnHtHuhg!mHnHuj^ hg!Uj hg!Ujd hg!Uh30j hg!Ujhg!Uhg!(h/hg!CJOJQJaJmHnHtH)@ABrstu-.ҮڣҮژҮڍҮڂҮwjhg!UjLhg!Uj hg!UjR hg!Uj hg!U(h/hg!CJOJQJaJmHnHtHh30jX hg!Ujhg!Uhg!&h/hg!5OJQJmHnHtHujhg!UmHnHu.B2[]^l&|_`gd? & FgdFPgdX)gd?gd?gd{ gdN%gdg!$ ( %./012;<VWXYZ[\^_l#$45|CնǭǙ|r|n|j|cYcYcNcjh?h?Uh?h?6] h?h?h?hvjh{ 0J4U h{ h{ hZhhKjhKCJU&h/hg!5OJQJmHnHtHuh30mHnHu jFhg!UmHnHujhg!UmHnHuhg!mHnHu(h/hg!CJOJQJaJmHnHtHh30jhg!UCDE]^_`az{, - e f !!N!O!!!!!"","-"i"j"""##l#m#''b-c-11A2B222222288P:Q:ººººֶΠhS hShShh hv hlKhlKhlKh?B*phh?B*phh{ h?h h?h?h?h?0Jjh?h?Ujh?h?U=- f !O!!!"-"j""#m##$b$$$$$0%`%|%% & FgdlK5gdlKgdlKgd?gd?gd?%%i&&&H'''(F(](~((("))).***+A+++,,-,.gdlKgdlKgdlKgd?,.]..I//0(0001122~333334,4A4U4k4444gdSgdSgdS & FgdFPgdlKgdlKgdlK45Z6&7Q7|7799v:;<s==>?? @@@xAB"CCXD:EEE & FgdFPgdSgdSgdSQ:::>>??AABBDDGG[H\HHHHHJNN O OPP:Q&R'R+T,TUUVUWVWZZ5\6\\\d]e]h^i^^^:_;_P_Q___ff#g$ghheiiидаааЬЬШС h*_h*_h443hXWhLAhB3jhYl0J4Uh /jh /0J4U h /h / hC'hC'hC' h?nh?nh?nhvhShh hShS?EGOIIIJJKM#MMO:QfQQQ5RRtSwTUUVVcWgd /gd /gdC'gdC'gd?ngd?ngd?ngdScWWW,X|XXXNYcYYZ?ZQZVZ_Z/[\]h^__``accc_ddgd /gd /gd /deMeee%fAfNff[gheiRjj`klm%o=o1pqmrrsEtgd*_  & F^gdg!gd*_gd*_gd443gd /gd /iiHjIjjj(k)k l lllcmdmnnooqqvvMyNyz^|_|||||S~T~̀΀̄̈́߄ab:;efوڈuv΋ϋ-.ABR¾¾¾¾hhFP hFPhFPhdx hdxhdxjhdx0J4UhShYl hYlhYlhC< h*_hB3hB3hXW h*_h*_h*_DEtgttuuvRv!wkwxxz%z{{|}}~ SE߄gdg!gddxgddxgdYlgdYlgdYlgd*_gd*_߄ ي_ӋW1>ŎϏ7:X`gd5 & FW^`Wgd{ & FW^`Wgd{ & FV^`Vgd{gd:h h 5\4  !"#$<{| hX)h{ hWh%CJ aJ hRh%h,0J#mHnHuh% h%0J#jh%0J#Uh,jh,U $%|gdX)xgdWgd}gdGh]hgd} .&`#$gd} 50P:pK. A!"#o$%a DyK yK phttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcodeDyK yK Hmailto:medialiaison@treasury.gov.au}DyK _Toc267747835}DyK _Toc267747836}DyK _Toc267747837}DyK _Toc267747838}DyK _Toc267747839}DyK _Toc267747840}DyK _Toc267747841}DyK _Toc267747842}DyK _Toc267747843}DyK _Toc267747844}DyK _Toc267747845}DyK _Toc267747846}DyK _Toc267747847}DyK _Toc267747848}DyK _Toc267747849}DyK _Toc267747850}DyK _Toc267747851}DyK _Toc267747852}DyK _Toc267747853}DyK _Toc267747854}DyK _Toc267747855}DyK _Toc267747856}DyK _Toc267747857}DyK _Toc267747858}DyK _Toc267747859}DyK _Toc267747860}DyK _Toc267747861}DyK _Toc267747862}DyK _Toc267747863DyK yK >http://www.consumerlaw.gov.au/DyK yK ,http://ors.act.gov.auDyK yK &http://accc.gov.auDyK yK &http://asic.gov.auDyK yK <http://fairtrading.nsw.gov.auDyK yK phttp://www.consumeraffairs.nt.gov.au/Pages/default.aspxDyK yK <http://fairtrading.qld.gov.auDyK yK <http://www.cbs.sa.gov.au/wcm/DyK yK @http://www.consumer.tas.gov.au/DyK yK >http://www.consumer.vic.gov.auDyK yK <http://www.commerce.wa.gov.au9666666666vvvvvvvvv666666>6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666hH666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666H@H GNormalOJQJ_HaJmH sH tH R@R ]Yo Heading 1$$@&5CJ$PJ\^JaJ R@R ]Yo Heading 2$$@&5CJ PJ\^JaJJ@J l Heading 3$$@&5CJPJ\N@N  : Heading 4$$@&5CJPJ\]P@P  : Heading 5 <@&5PJ\]^JaJDA@D Default Paragraph FontRiR 0 Table Normal4 l4a (k( 0No List NON ]Yo Char Char115CJ$OJPJQJ\^JaJ NON ]Yo Char Char105CJ OJPJQJ\^JaJPOP l Char Char9"5CJOJPJQJ\aJmH sH LO!L  : Char Char85CJOJPJQJ\]aJLO1L  : Char Char75OJPJQJ\]^JaJbOBb BOLd BCx<b% *$#5CJOJPJQJ^JaJmH sH V>@V [Title,&dPOm$5@CJ4KHPJaJ4VOaV [ Char Char6'5@CJ4KHOJPJQJaJ4mH sH FVqF c0FollowedHyperlink >*B*ph:O: :v Bullet L1  & Fxjj W Table Grid7:V00O0 _> Table Copy:O: _> Table Heading5HH v0 Balloon TextCJOJQJ^JaJJJ v0 Char Char5CJOJQJ^JaJmH sH 6U@6 ' 0 Hyperlink >*B*phPOP  p TOC Headingd@& CJOJQJaJ:@: !:0 Footnote Text CJFOF :0 Char Char4CJOJQJaJmH sH PO"P d~ Table Bullet" & FZx^Z`.)@1. {2e0 Page Number6@6 KpTOC 1 $xx5CJN@N U9pTOC 2% ( x^CJaJmHnHu>@> {2epTOC 4&X^X OJQJaJ>@> {2epTOC 5' ^  OJQJaJ>@> {2epTOC 6(^ OJQJaJ>@> {2epTOC 7)^ OJQJaJ>@> {2epTOC 8*x^x OJQJaJ>@> {2epTOC 9+@^@ OJQJaJ4@4 -}0Header , !BOB ,}0 Char Char3OJQJaJmH sH 8 @8 /z0Footer . !CJ>O> .z0 Char Char2CJOJQJaJHCH 1"0Body Text Indent0x^:: 0"0 Char Char1 OJQJaJ2B"2 30 Body Text2x@1@ 20 Char CharOJQJaJmH sH @&@A@ { 0Footnote ReferenceH*6OR6 lK Bullet L2 5 & FJObJ :SņQx‡[zÊ /[h͌F͍AȎCrGH@>ݕҖ<F)j,œw(Ftcl <L΢4DʤӤkt $%|0800@0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 0 @0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@$0@$0@%0@%0@%0@%0@%0@%0@$0@%0@%0@%0@%0@%0@%0@%0@%0@%0@%0@%0@%0@$0@%0@%0@%0@%0@%0@%0@$0@0@%0@00^0^0^0^0^0^0^ 0^ 0^0^0^ 00`0 0 0 00 0 0 000`0 0 0  0 0 0  0  50 0 0 00 0  0 000 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0`0#0#0# 0!# 0"# 0## 0$# 0%#0`0(0`0(0`0) 00*0* 0&* 0'* 0(* 0)* 0** 0+* 0,* 0-* 0.*0*0, 0/, 00,0, 01, 02, 03,0,0,0,0,0,0,0*0s50s5 04s5 05s50*0 80 80 80 8 06 8 07 8 0 8 0 80*0=0=0=0= 08=0*0B0B0B 09B 0:B0B0B 0;B 0<B 0=B0B 0>B 0?B0B0B 0@B0*0N 0AN 0BN 0CN0N 0DN 0EN 0FN0*0NQ 0GNQ 0HNQ 0INQ 0JNQ 0KNQ0NQ0NQ0NQ0NQ0NQ0NQ 0LNQ 0MNQ 0NNQ 0ONQ0NQ0NQ 0PNQ 0QNQ 0RNQ 0SNQ0NQ 0TNQ 0UNQ 0VNQ0NQ 0WNQ 0XNQ0NQ0NQ0NQ0NQ0NQ 0YNQ0NQ 0ZNQ0*0%g 0[%g 0\%g 0]%g 0^%g0%g 0_%g 0`%g 0a%g0%g 0b%g 0c%g0%g0%g 0d%g 0e%g0%g0*0r 0fr0r0r0*0u0u0u 0gu 0hu0u 0iu0*0| 0j|0|0|0*00 0k 0l0 0m 0n00 0o 00 0S 60S 60S 70S 70S 60S 60S0S0 70[ 0[ 0[ 0[ 70[ 0[ 0[ 70[ 0[ 0[ 0[ 0[ 70[0 0 0͌ 0͌ 0͌ 0͌ 0͌ 0͌ 0͌ 0͌ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0` 0` 0` 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 00(00(000(00(00(00(00(00(00(00000@ 0@ 0@ 0@ 000:@0ȑ00@0@0@0ȑ00@0@0@0ȑ00@0@0@0ȑ000 0w0 0w0 0w0 0w0 00 0@.0@0@0@000wȑ00  !|@.CQ:iRx+Y]^_`acdimpuvxyB%,.4EcWdEt߄Q` Z\befghjklnoqrstwz[!Ro|Gce 0 2 [ w y " > @ ] y {  - / > Z \ u  2 4 L h j " > @ r t.0;WY[D]נ x .:̢4{2Ȥ"QixXX %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%XXXXXXXXXXX!(*!!@  @ 0(  B S  ?H0(   _Hlt267646473 _Hlt267751820 _Toc267747835 _Toc267747836 _Toc267747837 _Toc267747838 _Toc267747839 _Toc267747840 _Toc267747841 _Toc267747842 _Toc267747843 _Toc267747844 _Toc267747845 _Toc267747846 _Toc267747847 _Toc267747848 _Toc267747849 _Toc267747850 _Toc267747851 _Toc267747852 _Toc267747853 _Toc267747854 _Toc267747855 _Toc267747856 _Toc267747857 _Toc267747858 _Toc267747859 _Toc267747860 _Toc267747861 _Toc267747862 _Toc267747863_a#(()*,s5 8=BNNQ%gru|S[c@@ Sk,$'(()*,58=BNbQ ] u   5 L k " A r t1;Z ;<?@͢΢֢ע349:ɤʤҤӤ  #Gf 3 [ z " A ] |  0 > ] u   5 L k " A r t1;Zh #33Gf 3 [ z " A ] |  0 > ] u   5 L k " A r t1;Zנ x ;͢43ɤx # T Z6,{t<7   {'z#n"R>C?-CprW5*dvbPA~0G ^`OJQJo( 8^8`OJQJo(^`OJ QJ ^J o(o  p^ `OJ QJ o(  @ ^ `OJ QJ o( x^x`OJQJo(H^H`OJ QJ ^J o(o ^`OJ QJ o( ^`OJ QJ o(^`#^`5B*CJOJ QJ \^J aJph.#^`5B*CJOJ QJ \^J aJph-.#^`5B*CJOJ QJ \^J aJph#^`5B*CJOJ QJ \^J aJph() ^ `D ^D `p^p`^`# ^ `5B*CJOJ QJ \^J aJph()#/^/`5B*CJOJ QJ \^J aJph()^`^`]^]` ^ ` ^ ` ^ `D^D`#^`5B*CJOJ QJ \^J aJph()#^`5B*CJOJ QJ \^J aJph()^`^`^`^`^`^`^`#^`5B*CJOJ QJ \^J aJph()#^`5B*CJOJ QJ \^J aJph()^`^`^`^`<^<`d^d`^` #f#^f`#5B*CJOJ QJ \^J aJph()#^`# #^ `#! #^! `# #^ `#H#^H`##^`#o#^o`##^`## ^ `5B*CJOJ QJ \^J aJph()#^`5B*CJOJ QJ \^J aJph()^`^`! ^! ` ^ `&^&`^`*^*`#m^m`5B*CJOJ QJ \^J aJph()#^`5B*CJOJ QJ \^J aJph()Z^Z` ^ ` ^ ` ^ `O^O` ^ `^`#^`5B*CJOJ QJ \^J aJph()#^`5B*CJOJ QJ \^J aJph()#^#`a^a` ^ ` ^ `^`Y^Y`^`h^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJ QJ ^J o(hHohp^p`OJ QJ o(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJ QJ ^J o(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJ QJ ^J o(hHohP^P`OJ QJ o(hH#^`5B*CJOJ QJ \^J aJph()#^`5B*CJOJ QJ \^J aJph()^`^`^`^`^`^`^`#^`5B*CJOJ QJ \^J aJph()#^`5B*CJOJ QJ \^J aJph()^`^`^`^`^`^`^`h^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJ QJ o(hH-hp^p`OJ QJ o(hHh@ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJ QJ ^J o(hHoh^`OJ QJ o(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJ QJ ^J o(hHohP^P`OJ QJ o(hH##^#`5CJOJ QJ \aJo(hH- ^`o(hH j ^j `o(hH  ^ `o(hH ^`o(hH V^V`o(hH ^`o(hH ^`o(hH A^A`o(hHh h^h`hH.h 8^8`hH.h L^`LhH.h  ^ `hH.h  ^ `hH.h xL^x`LhH.h H^H`hH.h ^`hH.h L^`LhH.prW{'*dPA~) ) 8* * R>C?-C   HSJ5T`Ԭ\        "찇Д                4B/#x]` /H& /#*wV /#,"b/#x/l~!/#,n}%/#,i=&/#,Zi)/#,V*/#x"]/+/#,`\C3/^(3/#,m5/#,~y77/B'9/#, g;/#oM@>/#,\[>/#,^>/#x)>/"h?/#s8B/#,C/#,4`$D/#sC5E/#,)G/#p>J/#%IKR/#6S/#,}w[T/#,AU^eVx/(X/#,uX/#,[/#,2=_/s3a/#*Gc/d/#,f{g/#,j/%l/#,TPmPo/#T50p/#sKy/y;z/>F{/#,e`}/9*68uwW&16v?nG(q;Q Z ` { = G _ h r SEHCCiD `8 !g!13"u"%d[&C'UI(J)X)b)m*6w+}+.-/30F0Z1 1&'1K2B3443m4:4Zs5/6O7I[8U9S98:C<;=t=V>_>>?SL?|vBEHF:GJsJ+GK M<'MFP|'QVV=TX*_CcWc{2e:kDU=@=KN" \Wtvy'L]uS:|m,3"GK$NO3>D_6 n[" /gY-il z1tJ,K2ed\#L{'y6' Za l|h}bZp6dx;lKE :J ZC'^w_5kvGk{ /#RXWqha{QURj9LADmmYl@x @Unknown G: Times New Roman5Symbol3& : Arial7K@Cambria]  MS MinchoArial Unicode MSW1   MS Gothic l r SVbNiMFrutiger-RomanFrutiger 55 RomanC  PLucida Grande7&{ @Calibri?5 z Courier New;Wingdings]Humanist 777 LightCambriaQ Humanist 777Cambria 1h_'&)g_' ۍU.7V2!ohh4h J#QHP$P'L2?Preventing unfair terms in window and floor covering agreements Fair tradingConsumer Affairs Victoria McDonoughH          Oh+'0@(,8DX lx    @Preventing unfair terms in window and floor covering agreementsFair tradingConsumer Affairs ɫƵ Normal.dot McDonough5Microsoft Office Word@vA@r*@r*@ԆAۍGP& Rt`0  &WMFC4klahRt EMF!=g   ah% Rp@"ArialDcLE XE g -E E (cۦ0* *lG0c@00Z00E E $E  3&: ArialwUnw(#!> K0@cZ0@cLn0Xcdv%   TT,<X.@-@,LahP |- T,J.@-@,9LahxAustralia Consumer Law7.*..<..*.G../;TTJ.@-@9LahP L T,O .@-@,?LahPreventing unfair terms in window and floor covering agreements7.*.../....G*.<.//;/../.*.*./.....G..*TT O .@-@ LahP -Rp@"ArialE DcE E g -E E (c0**lG0c@00Z00E E $E  3&: Arial> ,`nK0@cZ0@cLn0Xcdv%  T,7.@-@,-LahlDTPLI8402_07/14$!TT7.@-@-LahP PA!96Rp@"Arial@0*E T4xcE (cY@0 0T4 0c lG0c@00Z007/14&&&3&: Arialh> C K0@cZ0@cLn0Xcdv%  TT:4.@-@vL96P1%TT5:5.@-@5vL96P Y$!96" " Rp'@"ArialE dE g -E E (c0ddlG0c@00Z0d?d@3&: Arial>0D!K0@cZ0@cLn0Xcdv% %   T0,H.@-@,&LahPreventing unfair terms in window and V{{zJ>>I{>V>K{V{>>=>={> Tp,U.@-@,LahXfloor J>V>TV .@-@VLahtcovering agreements{z{V>>zV{{zD{TT v .@-@ LahP wz!ah 'O% Ld @ !!??% ( " Rp@"ArialE DcE E g -E LE (c0d?dlG0c@00Z0greementsh:XX3&: Arial>$< VK0@cZ0@cLn0Xcdv%  T,r .@-@,6LahA guide for legal practitioners and consumer advocatesF===8!='8=8='77!!==8'88==8=<8=X8'8=6=88!88TT r .@-@ LahP 8 % TT,<X.@-@,LahP - Rp@"ArialmK$Kxclc10224 lc=22lc(02c2lGc U0<3&: Arial  'C ?TdlK0cZ0cLn0cdv% % 6h6ah6a66g6`g6`66f6_f6_66e6^e6^66d6]d6]66c6\c6\66b6[b6[66a6Za6Z66`6Y`6Y6 6 _6X_6X 6  6 ^6W^6W 6  6 ]6V]6V 6  6 \6U\6U 6  6 [6T[6T 6 6Z6SZ6S66Y6RY6R66X6QX6Q66W6PW6P66V6OV6O6  ."System-@"Arial-  2 T) ,2 l)Australia Consumer Law   2 l j2 y)?Preventing unfair terms in window and floor covering agreements   2 ym @"Arial-"2 )DTPLI8402_07/14 2 ` ,_vIq@"Arial- 2 RqqIv_1 2 RvqIv_ ,_vIq''@"Arial-- D2 \)&Preventing unfair terms in window and        2 })floor  (2 }scovering agreementsL    2 } ,O- @ !Q'-'@"Arial-\2 )6A guide for legal practitioners and consumer advocates        2  - 2 ) @"Arial--՜.+,D՜.+,l( hp|  .Uh' '@Preventing unfair terms in window and floor covering agreements Introduction;Understanding Australias unfair contract term legislation4 How does unfair contract term legislation work? What is an unfair term?3 What is a standard form consumer contract?* What is the effect of an unfair term?+ What is the aim of enforcement action?L Will using this guide protect a business from having a term made void?<Common unfair terms in window and floor covering agreements Deposits and part payments& Payment before completion of work Payment default& Reservation of ownership of goods Cancellation Offences under the ACL Liability exclusions Variations from samples Contract variations Pre-installation work% Reliance on consumers expertise Entire agreement terms9Australian Consumer Law unfair contract term legislation4 Section 23 Unfair terms of consumer contracts# Section 24 Meaning of unfair* Section 25 Examples of unfair termsU Section 26 Terms that define main subject matter of consumer contracts etc. ar) Section 27 Standard form contracts= Section 28 Contracts to which this Part does not apply Contacts% Australian Capital Territory Commonwealth New South Wales Northern Territory Queensland South Australia Tasmania ɫƵ Western Australia Title Headings&x(OWk _PID_HLINKSTRIMIDA N(3~http://www.commerce.wa.gov.au/c6k{ http://www.consumer.vic.gov.au/c$cx http://www.consumer.tas.gov.au/cAHuhttp://www.cbs.sa.gov.au/wcm/c:urhttp://fairtrading.qld.gov.au/c=)o8http://www.consumeraffairs.nt.gov.au/Pages/default.aspxc%ylhttp://fairtrading.nsw.gov.au/ci9ihttp://asic.gov.au/cy3fhttp://accc.gov.au/c,}chttp://ors.act.gov.au/c(r`http://www.consumerlaw.gov.au/c)J$mailto:medialiaison@treasury.gov.auc4)8http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcodec  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{}~Root Entry FuBData |21TableIWordDocument7SummaryInformation(p(DocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjq  FMicrosoft Office Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q